Save this article to read it later.

Find this story in your accountsSaved for Latersection.

This yearsSonic the Hedgehogcould have been the biggest hit of 1996, in ways both good and bad.

Article image

But thats also part of its appeal.

Maybe that wasnt the original intention.

Such post-post-production tomfoolery usually spells disaster, but the effects in the finished picture are mostly seamless.

Aside from a couple of odd shots (was the earlier Sonic also supposed to be bigger?

), the new and re-improved hedgehog looks like he was meant to be there all along.

It helps, probably, that director Fowler is himself a VFX veteran.

Sonics solitude gets the better of him, however.

(Im the top banana … in a world full of hungry monkeys.

I see youve taken a lover.

Does she have a name, or shall we call her Collateral Damage?

Trust me, it all sounds better coming out of his mouth.)

Quite the contrary, he overcommits in the best possible way.

His vitality makes an otherwise routine endeavor worthwhile.

The movie is fine, but the villains a delight.

Tags: